Who wrote that article you just read?
I ask because lately, there's a decent chance the answer is nobody. Not a real somebody, anyway.
Last month, Futurism dropped an investigation into a company called Brown Brothers Media. These guys found a clever, and pretty dark, way to make money: buy up struggling local news sites, then quietly replace the humans with invented ones. Fake journalists. Fake subject matter experts. Fake credentials, fake personal histories, fake everything — except the traffic, which was very real. Tens of millions of page views a month, according to Futurism's numbers.
How'd they pull that off? By churning out thousands of SEO-optimized articles under these made-up bylines, a lot of it plagiarized from actual reporters, some of it built on personal experiences that never happened. Sloppy stuff that gave readers nothing, but gave Google's algorithm exactly what it wanted.
And here's the part that stopped me cold: one of the brothers behind this operation apparently has ties to Ghislaine Maxwell. Not exactly the guy you'd trust to tell you the truth about anything.
So where was all that traffic coming from? Google. Mostly Google.
That's the piece that matters to anyone who reads news online, which is pretty much all of us. Futurism reached out to Google for comment before publishing and didn't get much back. But after the story ran, something shifted. Google quietly started suppressing Brown Brothers' sites across Search and Google News. Not long after that, the company stopped publishing entirely.
Now Google's gone further. It just rewrote its own guidelines to explicitly ban fake bylines and AI-generated headshots, saying flat out it won't prioritize sites that use them.
Here's what used to be in there: Google told site owners that clearly naming who created content put them "on a path to success," and encouraged accurate bylines wherever readers would expect them. Fine, reasonable, a little obvious.
What got added is sharper. The new language says to avoid "deceptive authorship information." Fabricating a creator's profile — AI headshots, invented names, false credentials, anything that makes a page look like it was written by a real human expert when it wasn't — Google now calls that a form of deception. And deception, in its words, makes a page untrustworthy to readers and to its own quality systems alike. Translation: it's a signal that you're junk, and Google will treat you that way.
I get why this matters to me, and I think it matters to you too. I've spent years relying on strangers' words to figure out where to go, what's safe, what's worth my time. A trail review. A visa requirement. A restaurant recommendation in some town I'd never heard of three days earlier. If the person who wrote that doesn't exist, what exactly am I trusting?
Turns out Brown Brothers wasn't some isolated oddball. Futurism points to similar schemes popping up all over. One Canadian outlet got caught when its nonexistent reporters literally malfunctioned and started spitting out error messages instead of articles — which is almost funny, if it weren't so telling. Another Canadian site plagiarized real journalism under the byline of a fabricated Indigenous journalist. More of the same turned up in Florida and Rhode Island.
Here's the part I can't let slide, though. Google cracking down on fake bylines is a step. But this is the same company whose AI summaries now sit on top of search results, pulling answers from real reporting without sending readers to the actual source. If original journalism keeps getting squeezed out of view, who's left to write the stuff Google says it wants to reward?
I don't have a tidy answer for that one. What I do know is this: the internet rewards whoever's loudest and fastest, not necessarily whoever's telling the truth. That's been true since long before AI showed up to make faking it easier.
So next time you read something online, it's worth a quick question before you trust it: does this person actually exist? Click the byline. Look for a real history, real other work, a real face that shows up more than once.
Curiosity's free. Use it before you believe anything.
Source: Futurism
New here? Start at our homepage: DWS
